New FBI Texts: An Obama Briefing, a Mysterious Month-Long Gap, and an Anti-Trump Mission

We are now getting our first look at a new trove of text messages between FBI agents Peter Strzok and Lisa Page — who were having an affair during the 2016 election cycle as they worked on the Clinton email investigation, then later as part of the Mueller probe, from which they’ve been dismissed. The messages reinforce some previously-known dynamics, but also raise new questions. Leah wrote up the basics earlier, but here are a few major takeaways, from my perspective:(1) In the “old news” file, it’s clearer than ever how viscerally Strzok and Page despised Donald Trump as a candidate, lashing out at him as a “f–ing idiot,” and calling his election “f–ing terrifying” and depressing. They also didn’t think much of their Congressional overseers, referring to the legislative body as “utterly useless” and “contemptible.” It appears as though Strzok’s disdain for Republicans and GOP voters extended beyond Trump, as he expressed resentment toward the “ignorant hillbillys [sic]” who voted to defeat former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe’s wife in a Virginia Senate election. She ran as a Democrat, of course, and was funneled hundreds of thousands of dollars by then-governor Terry McAuliffe, a longtime Clinton ally. That money flowed to her campaign while McCabe was connected to the Bureau’s Clinton email probe. The exchanges also demonstrate the deep reverence and admiration both agents harbored for their boss at the time, FBI Director James Comey.(2) One text generating a lot of attention this morning is a message sent on September 2, 2016 (roughly two months before election day) suggesting that President Obama was personally and keenly interested in the specific status of their investigation (see update):Let’s think about this — the timing is a bit strange here, isn’t it? Remember, Comey announced his determination (the wrong one, in my view) not to recommend charges against Hillary Clinton in July of that year (Strzok helped soften anti-Hillary language in Comey’s statement). That decision was made public the month following an infamous ‘tarmac meeting’ between Bill Clinton and Attorney General Loretta Lynch, the optics of which Strzok called “astoundingly bad” in a newly-disclosed text message to Page. Comey also began drafting a legal exoneration memo long before the investigation had concluded, before Mrs. Clinton herself was even interviewed, and after top aides were offered immunity and given passes for lying to the FBI. In late September, the Hillary email probe roared back to life upon the discovery of sensitive emails on the unsecure laptop of ex-Congressman Anthony Weiner, the estranged husband of Huma Abedin. More on that in a moment. But why would Obama want a thorough briefing on “everything” going on in the Clinton probe at a time when it was basically dormant, though technically still open? Does the ‘potus’ text necessarily refer to the Clinton investigation? Or was it about something else? Keep in mind that these texts were released in connection with a Senate inquiry into the FBI’s handling of the Clinton matter, so it might follow that the Hillary email scandal was the relevant subject here. But given the dates, it’s possible that Obama was asking for information on other FBI work, like looking into Russia’s election meddling, or scrutinizing the Trump campaign. We don’t have that full context yet, but I’d imagine the DOJ’s nonpartisan Inspector General’s office (which is conducting its own independent investigation into how the Bureau handled its business on Clinton’s emails) does. If, indeed, Obama was asking for a detailed briefing on the Clinton probe while it was still open, this vow he made on national television months earlier becomes a problem:”I do not talk to FBI Directors about pending investigations,” he said, promising that Mrs. Clinton would not receive any special treatment from his Justice Department. Keeping those bright lines separate is “institutionally, how we have always operated,” he averred. Critics have long pointed to his public statement that Clinton had not broken the law as evidence of improper presidential meddling. The FBI was actively on the case at the time, and his pronouncement of the ‘proper’ conclusion angered some within the Bureau and was attacked by conservatives as an attempt to prejudice an ongoing investigation. If Obama was also applying pressure behind the scenes, that looks more suspicious, particularly because he asserted outright that talking to FBI Directors about pending investigations is something that he scrupulously avoids. In this case, it appears he personally solicited such a meeting. Did he consider the issue no longer “pending”? Or, again, was he asking for information on a separate matter entirely? Let’s wait and see.(3) We now know about the existence of an unexplained, one-month gap in between the discovery of Clinton emails on Weiner’s laptop, and Comey notifying Congress that this “recent” development wa

Source: New FBI Texts: An Obama Briefing, a Mysterious Month-Long Gap, and an Anti-Trump Mission – Guy Benson

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s